What to do about Detroit?
NY Times columnist Jodi Wilgoren writes about the myriad problems plaguing Detroit:
Shrinking, Detroit Faces Fiscal Nightmare.
With the city facing a $389 million shortfall over three years and the threat of receivership, Mayor Kwame M. Kilpatrick announced this month that Detroit would soon lay off 686 people and eliminate 237 vacant jobs, cut employees’ pay 10 percent across the board, end overnight bus service and close the aquarium. That is just a start, as consultants consider cutting departments – like cultural affairs and the zoo, and health, transit and street lighting – and ponder new taxes on everything from alcohol to vacant land.
—
So a dour mood has descended over a city that has been seeking a renaissance for more than a generation. The words people use to describe the situation are “cataclysmic,” “debilitating,” “monumental,” “dire” and “grave.”
—
Causes of the crisis are complex, and, unsurprisingly, much debated, but the story starts with some staggering numbers. Having lost one million residents in a half century, Detroit is expected to see its population drop by 50,000 more in the next five years; 15,168 business have departed since 1972. New loft developments credited with revitalizing downtown are mainly filled with empty-nesters, not the building blocks of a healthy community; white flight has become bright flight, with families and people earning more than $50,000 a year leading the way out of town.But the city’s payroll still has the 18,000 employees of a decade ago (after spiking to 21,000 in the late 1990’s), with 1.4 administrative employees for every 1,000 residents, far higher than the 1.0 median for major cities. Detroit, with antiquated technology like a 29-year-old payroll system, also spends more than most other cities on policing ($377 per capita, compared with a median of $221), garbage ($100 per capita versus Chicago’s $62 and Milwaukee’s $52) and other services.
Mayor Kwame Kilpattrick: “We’ve been a black eye on the landscape of America for too long,” he said in an interview. “I don’t want that stigma attached to me and my kids anymore.”

What a plague… I get depressed everytime I read something like that.
The only plague I see here is Detroit’s “hip-hop” mayor. I would love to see someone defend his ctions.
This certainly extends beyond Kwame (K-Dawg?), but he still needs to go. I’m afraid of who’s to come…
“I don’t want that stigma attached to me and my kids anymore.”
This has got to be one of the most self-centered statements I’ve ever heard. Yeah, like the “stigma” he refers to is the most important reason to fix the city’s problems. Plus, he forgot to mention his wife. Maybe that’s because she still lives in the house they lived in before he became mayor while he parties with hookers every night at the Manoogian Mansion.
For me, being an expatriate, all I have for now are my memories of Detroit. Basically, I have a love/hate relationship with my home city. I love it for what it used to be and what it can be but I despise it for what it is. Detroit is a city that has steadily, but surely, declined in number and in care because of several things, I think. One thing is the racial line drawn between inhabitants of Southeastern Michigan. Another thing is the leadership of Detroit in its city council and in the mayor’s office. No one is working for the good of Detroit except for the few residents that actually care about it. Everyone at higher levels (meaning those who have some measure of monetary controls) seems to forget that what they have in Detroit is a city with an amazingly colorful heritage and an equally robust future, if it can be managed properly. It makes me sad to see Detroit used as the ball on a ping pong table, only to be allowed to fall off and roll away.
My solution…stop defining Detroit as a major city and give it back to nature. Break it up into several burroughs that have the power to focus locally and control more local issues. The city is too big with too sparse a population for it to be controlled by an underfunded centralized government.
When I get out of school, I’m going to come back and run for mayor!!!
Good, you can appoint me to direct preservation and planning!!
You are right in that Detroit is way too big (area) for the population. It always was, even with 2 million plus residents. Detroit made a big mistake in not building high-density residential developments. By any chance did you see today’s Free Press or News? Both had depressing articles on the dwindling population. Here’s an excerpt:
The city’s population has dropped below pre-1920 levels, according to a report released Monday by the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments.
The report estimates Detroit’s population as of January slid to 899, 387—the lowest since 1917 when there were an estimated 820,778 people living in the city.
The latest figures show the city’s population has dropped 5.5 percent since the 2000 census when there were 951,270 people living in Detroit. Census Info via the Detroit News
Yes, Jeff very good point…but, I don’t think that that would solve any budget issues they are facing. It would seem very plausible to break Detroit down to several sections to be run locally. However, the only problem I see with this is that certain sections would not be influenced by business contributions to help out the community. The east side of Detroit composes of some big corporate businesses and/or attractions that would most likely give back to the community. Now, whether or not they do, I don’t. But split Detorit in half, east vs. west and it will look as if the east side will have a bigger advantage than the west side. But yes, come back and run for mayor.
Hello, I don’t live in Detroit, but have visited Detroit many times. Detorit has so much history like, music, car makers and big industry. It would be a sad day, not only for people living in Detroit, but for the whole nation. To solve any problems, you much have good leaders. And if the person or persons you choice to do that, don’t meet the expectation, they should be remove from office. Detroit has major, major leadership and management problems. The people whom suppose to control/ management and make good decision are not during so. I have been in management over 30 years with the U.S. Government. I can tell you, if I was the Mayor of Detroit, there would not be the kinds of problems Detroit has right now. In Governments, there are hard decision to be made with no question asks. As a manger, I would never fire polices officer or any city workers. I would fire the managers of each department head if the job is not getting done. The supervisors and managers have the control, so you have to let them go. By using these methods, you would ensure mangers and supervisor get fire, not the workers. The workers are only as good as the learnershipt. If manager can’t lead, they need to get out of the way. If governments and companies keep those non-produced managers and supervisors, the same problems they have now will be there later. I have many new ideas for Detroit that surly can help Detroit come in of their budget problems and save all city workers jobs. If anyone interested seeing Detroit get back on track, let me know.